COMSOL Conference and 5.2


COMSOL Conference and 5.2

Better Than Ever

It has taken us some time to share about this year’s COMSOL Conference because we have been thinking of just the right word to describe it. The problem is that there is too much to describe, and we know we cannot describe it as indescribable… so we waited. And we waited. And now after more than two months have passed with numerous opportunities to employ the information shared at the Conference we understood just what to share. Better Than Ever! Better than ever, for sure. As advancements are made each year, the training sessions have greater impact, industry experts share more state-of-the-art solutions, and innovative research shared from peers brings more clarity… which allows for further advancements. If you ask us… COMSOL Conference 2015 and 5.2 was Better Than Ever.


Even the folks at got in on the action. In an article posted on October 23, 2015, Shawn Wasserman discusses several key components of COMSOL 5.2 He appropriately titles his article… “What would engineers want to know about COMSOL 5.2?”


Three Highlights in the article answer Shawn’s question.


  • Application Builder Efficiency Boost
  • COMSOL Server and Improved User Licensing Experience
  • User Defined Non-Linear Materials


On the topic of User Defined Non-Linear Materials, our very own Jeffrey Crompton was quoted as saying…“One of the main things that will help us is the ability to put in our own material properties. This will help with structural mechanics and magnetic materials that have hysteresis we couldn’t take into account before, so our results will be a lot more accurate.”


An article like this goes hand in hand with the overall COMSOL Conference experience. Because of what we see taking place at the COMSOL Conference and the progress users will make throughout the year with the release of COMSOL 5.2, we see great advances and powerful solutions made available to more and more engineers all the time, especially with the easier user experience to convert multiphysics models into simulations apps.


You can read the full article here.

Seal Well Solves Green House Gas Problem

Seal Well in the field

Seal Well Solves Green House Gas Problem in Oil and Gas Wells


It is not very often that AltaSim gets to openly brag (with permission) about one of its clients, but this is one of those times. We are excited to share about the work of Homer L. Spencer, P. Eng, Seal Well Inc. in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. We encourage our readers to investigate the work of Seal Well for themselves by visiting their website at


Seal Well saw a problem. Many of the Plugging and Sealing tools and procedures for oil and gas wells were not reliable allowing for continued escape of geologically stored green house gases. Cement, while inexpensive and universally available for well completion and plugging purposes, is known to have certain inherent properties that make it less than ideal for sealing wells. A quick explanation of the problems associated with using cement can be found here.


Seal Well contacted AltaSim with the ideas and the determination to change the way wells are sealed. More than 430,000 oil and gas wells have been drilled in Alberta alone, and while natural gas leakage from a portion of these wells is not known with precision, it has been estimated at about 3.5 million tonnes per year CO2 equivalent. Seal Well saw an opportunity to stop this… permanently.


The Technology:

  • The technology permanently seals greenhouse gas emitting wells reliably and economically.
  • Uses bismuth-tin alloy because of the low melting point, volumetric expansion during solidification and high specific gravity
  • A solid plug of bismuth-tin is lowered into the well, heated to melting and then allowed to cool so that it seals the well
  • Heats the bismuth-tin until it melts and flows into the annular region of the well
  • Has been tested on 7 wells showing 0 cubic meters per day leakage after deployment


The Application & Benefits:

  • Eliminates leakage of greenhouse gases from abandoned wells by sealing surface casing vent flow
  • Already eliminated 215 T/yr from the 7 plugged wells (estimated leakage of 3.5 million tons/year in Alberta)
  • Estimated that 280,000 wells in Canada could need sealing in the future
  • Current repair methods cost between $300,000 and $8,000,000 to repair. Final cost of the Seal Well method will be small fraction of this cost.


AltaSim developed a transient conjugate heat transfer analysis to simulate the in-situ heating and melting of the bismuth-tin plug. The analysis included the conduction through the solid domain and convection in the liquid domain. The heat transfer analysis was used to calculate the time necessary to fully melt the bismuth-tin plug. AltaSim also modeled the solidification process including the volumetric expansion to determine the residual stress in the plug. These analyses enabled Seal Well to virtually test conceptual designs rapidly without the need for extensive physical testing. In addition, the insight gained from these computational analyses directed design modifications that produced an improved product.


Heat Transfer in Well Sealing


Bismth Alloy Plasticity


Dr. Jeff Crompton, Principal here at AltaSim Technologies will be presenting a Paper on this work at the COMSOL Conference in Boston in October. We invite you to explore this work and visit with Jeff before and/or after his talk.

COMSOL Midwest Meeting

Our Training enables students to be leaders in solving problems with COMSOL Multiphysics

COMSOL Midwest Meeting

July 22, 2015

Columbus, OH


AltaSim Technologies is joining with COMSOL to bring you the COMSOL Midwest Meeting, an all-day event where you can learn more about modeling with COMSOL Multiphysics® and advance your skills in multiphysics simulation. Together, we will be introducing the Application Builder, and teaching a variety of sessions which will allow you to see how your peers are working with simulations.


AltaSim Technologies will be on site all day, teaching several sessions and interacting with participants. Below is a list of the sessions we will be delivering:


9:45 – 11:15 AM      Meshing by Joshua Thomas
In this minicourse you will learn techniques for efficient meshing (an important skill for computationally demanding models). Specific topics will include CAD clean-up and how to combine swept meshing with unstructured free meshing in the same geometry. You will also learn how to define virtual mesh features for precise local mesh refinement.

9:45 – 11:15 AM      Electromagnetics Modeling by Sergei Yushanov
Learn about the scope of COMSOL Multiphysics® for modeling of electromagnetic problems. The functionality of the core package, the AC/DC, RF, Wave Optics, and Ray Optics Modules will be covered for simulation of problems involving electromagnetic fields in static, transient, low frequency and high frequency regimes.


2:45 – 4:15 PM      Best Practices in Multiphysics Analysis by Joshua Thomas
COMSOL Multiphysics® provides unique capabilities to solve Multiphysics problems via numerical methods. This minicourse will examine the best practices for coupling and solving Multiphysics problems using COMSOL Multiphysics. The Multiphysics modeling node will be reviewed along with methods of coupling physics that are not available within this modeling node. Sequential and intimate coupling strategies will be discussed, and the use of fully coupled and segregated solvers will be reviewed.


2:45 – 4:15 PM      CFD and Heat Modeling by Luke Gritter
Learn about using COMSOL Multiphysics® for modeling of conjugate heat transfer problems. This minicourse will include a discussion on heat transfer in fluids and solids. For convective heat transfer in fluids, the laminar and turbulent capabilities available within the Heat Transfer Module will be reviewed. These models include k-ε, k-Ω, Algebraic yPlus, L-VEL and low-Reynolds k-ε. Topics for radiative heat transfer include surface-to-surface radiation and radiation in participating media.


2:45 – 4:15 PM      Acoustics & Vibrations Modeling by Sergei Yushanov
Acoustic pressure waves in fluids such as air or water interact with surrounding structures resulting in vibrations in solids and absorption in porous materials. The Acoustics Module can simulation these waves and their effects. Recent news and additions to the module are also presented. Application areas include, but are not limited to: muffler design, mobile devices, transducer design, loudspeakers, pipe acoustics, sound insulation materials, acoustic scattering, transmission, and radiation phenomena.

4:30 – 6:00 PM     Multi-Phase Flow by Luke Gritter
This minicourse examines the two-phase flow capabilities available in the CFD Module for COMSOL Multiphysics®. Topics will include bubbly flow, Euler-Euler Modeling, Level-Set and Phase Field methodologies for representing two-phase flow. The solution methods for representing stationary and time-dependent solutions will be introduced. In addition, modeling of rotating machinery with mixture models will be discussed.



This information-packed event is being held at the Bridgewater Banquet & Conference Center,
10561 Sawmill Parkway, Powell, OH 43065. Bring a laptop to the event in order to gain the most hands-on experience, as this will allow you to start a FREE, two-week trial of COMSOL Multiphysics® software.


Click here to register. You can also send an email to to schedule some one on one time with us during the event.



MRI Webinar

MRI Scanner

MRI Webinar

(Recording Accessible Until December 18, 2015)


On June 18th, our very own Kyle Koppenhoefer joined Walter Frei, PhD, Applications Engineer, COMSOL, to present a free Webinar on Simulating MRI Heating of Medical Implants. As we wrote about last week, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is one of the most widely used and safest imaging modalities for medical diagnostics. (


Although the live event is over, you may access the webinar recording anytime until December 18, 2015. The link to the webinar recording is now available at:


You can also access a PDF download of the slide deck at Please contact the event host, Kristen Anderson, at, if you have any questions about watching the webinar recording or downloading the slides.


MRI safety remains a concern, but there is so much progress being made. When you access the webinar and work your way through the slide deck, remember that we are still “live” and ready to help. We welcome any questions that come which you can submit using the form in the lower right on this page… just “Ask AltaSim.” As we have updates, we will be sure to share them with all of our readers.


MRI – Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Simulation

MRI Scanner

MRI – Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Simulation

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is one of the most widely used and safest imaging modalities for medical diagnostics. Despite this, one of the major technological challenges facing the biomedical imaging world has been the issues created when a patient with metallic medical implants suffers the need (for any reason) for an MRI. With more and more medical implants being used to treat patients, MRI Safety is a growing concern. Consider just a few numbers:



  • ~600,000 heart stents (1)
  • ~900,000 coronary stents & ~700,000 peripheral artery stents (2, 3)
  • 2M stents per annum (4)



  • 50.6 MRI exams are performed per 1,000 population – 34 country average and 104.8 MRI exams per 1,000 population – United States (5)

Personally, we know people (and you may too) who are impacted by this current technological limitation. While most implanted devices are accepted as safe for exposure to MRI fields, conditions may arise when there is ambiguity or no specific guidance can be provided, and there is confusion regarding which patients with cardiovascular devices can safely undergo MR examination. Current guidelines based on the results of idealized tests place limits on MR exposure for a large percentage of stents, and the current approach fails to address conditions where finite length stents are joined to form a longer device, and in some cases unsafe examination of patients with implanted devices has occurred (6-10).


MR imaging exposes patients with metallic implants to possible risks associated with interaction with the magnetic field to produce translation or rotation, heating due to interaction with the Radio Frequency (RF) energy, or the development of artifacts on the MR image. Electrically conductive implants such as stents, wires, shunts or leads can act to concentrate the electric field in the vicinity of the device leading to excessive local heating that may cause tissue necrosis. The extent to which the electric field is concentrated is dependent on many parameters related to device design, MR machine characteristics and device location within the body. Hence simply listing a device as either safe or unsafe for MR exposure can fail to accurately represent the conditions under which a patient may be safely examined.


Currently a device’s compatibility with MR exposure is defined through a series of standardized tests that provide only limited representations of patient conditions; these tests are both time consuming and expensive and often fail to consider alternative device arrangements. Integration into patient guidelines is implemented using the “specific absorption ratio” (SAR) rather than temperature, the underlying cause of tissue necrosis. In addition, this approach does not take into account other factors such as the transient nature of the heating and cooling effects due to blood flow over the device or in the surrounding tissue. Thus more sophisticated approaches are required to accurately represent real world scenarios and better define conditions under which patients with implanted devices can be safely exposed to MR imaging.


And more sophisticated approaches are precisely what we are working on. AltaSim is fortunate to be working with people whose aim is to help bring real answers full of factual information by utilizing computational modeling and multiphysics simulation to serve not only the biomedical industry, but also the treating physician and the patient. These efforts align with our motto, “Tomorrow’s Technology Today” and we are excited about the real life possibilities for all involved. Your comments and questions are always welcome.


1. Reuters 2011 from Chan, Journal of the American Medical Association, July 5, 2011
2. MPMN, Volume 27, No. 7, 2011
3. U.S. Markets for Peripheral Vascular Stents, MedTech Insight Report #A254, 2011
4. OECD Health Statistics 2014 – Frequently Requested Data
5. Medtronic web page
6. FDA Public Health Notification: MRI-Caused Injuries in Patients with Implanted Neurological Stimulators, May 2005
7. MRI-Related Death of Patient With Aneurysm Clip, November 1992
8. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), Medical Device Report (MDR)
9. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database, MAUDE
10. Cardiovascular Catheters and Accessories,



Popular Posts
COMSOL Conference and 5.2

COMSOL Conference and 5.2
Better Than Ever
It has taken…

Seal Well in the field
Seal Well Solves Green House Gas Problem

Seal Well Solves Green House Gas Problem in Oil and…

Our Training enables students to be leaders in solving problems with COMSOL Multiphysics
COMSOL Midwest Meeting

COMSOL Midwest Meeting
July 22, 2015
Columbus, OH


Newsletter Registration:
Ask AltaSim: